Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Debtor Company for Non-Payment of Decretal Debt. Decretal debt remains due and payable despite unsuccessful attempt to set aside ex-parte decree; no bona fide defence raised. - Lawtext
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Debtor Company for Non-Payment of Decretal Debt. Decretal debt remains due and payable despite unsuccessful attempt to set aside ex-parte decree; no bona fide defence raised. - Lawtext — regulatory update affecting Government Contracting (SAM/FAR).
Aforeworn detected this change in the Government Contracting (SAM/FAR) space on September 5, 2026 and published this briefing so affected operators are forewarned rather than caught off guard. It is rated Low urgency. Government Contracting (SAM/FAR) (small-business set-asides) should confirm how it applies to their specific situation before acting. Aforeworn monitors Government Contracting (SAM/FAR) continuously and turns every detected change into a plain-English briefing like this one, so you always know first. Forewarned is forearmed.
What changed
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Debtor Company for Non-Payment of Decretal Debt. Decretal debt remains due and payable despite unsuccessful attempt to set aside ex-parte decree; no bona fide defence raised. - Lawtext
Who it affects
Government Contracting (SAM/FAR) (small-business set-asides)
What you must do
Note this update; no immediate action appears required, but monitor for follow-on rules.
Deadline
No fixed deadline was published, but changes like this are often enforced quickly — act promptly.
Never miss a change like this again
Aforeworn watches Government Contracting (SAM/FAR) around the clock and alerts you the moment a rule moves — with a plain-English brief on what to do.
Start your free trialRelated changes in Government Contracting (SAM/FAR)
- Bombay High Court Allows Tenant to Examine Stamp Vendor in Eviction Suit — Rejection of Witness Summons Set Aside. The Court held that the requirement of filing a list of witnesses under Order XVI CPC is directory, not mandatory, and the Trial Court has - Lawtext
- Madras High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Government Suit for Declaration of Nullity of Decree — Trial Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that a suit challenging a decree as null and v - Lawtext
- Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Bonafide Requirement Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rent Act. Appeal Court's Reversal Set Aside for Misappreciation of Evidence and Legal Principles. - Lawtext
- MSPs: Don’t waste this CMMC Level 2 pause - managedservicesjournal.com
- Defense contractors still struggling with basic CMMC requirements - cybersecuritydive.com