Ethyl Formate; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
EPA exempts ethyl formate from tolerance requirements for citrus, kiwifruit, and table grapes when used as a fumigant, effective immediately. No action needed for applicators, but label updates may follow.
Aforeworn detected this change in the Pesticide & Pest-Control Applicators space on July 6, 2026 and published this briefing so affected operators are forewarned rather than caught off guard. It is rated Low urgency. Fumigation companies and agricultural applicators using ethyl formate on citrus, kiwifruit, or table grapes should confirm how it applies to their specific situation before acting. There is a time constraint attached: None. Acting after that point can mean penalties, a lapsed licence, or lost eligibility — exactly the kind of surprise Aforeworn exists to prevent. Aforeworn monitors Pesticide & Pest-Control Applicators continuously and turns every detected change into a plain-English briefing like this one, so you always know first. Forewarned is forearmed.
What changed
Ethyl formate residues on these crops no longer require a tolerance, simplifying compliance with pesticide residue limits.
Who it affects
Fumigation companies and agricultural applicators using ethyl formate on citrus, kiwifruit, or table grapes
What you must do
No immediate action; monitor for label changes from EPA or registrants.
Deadline
None
Never miss a change like this again
Aforeworn watches Pesticide & Pest-Control Applicators around the clock and alerts you the moment a rule moves — with a plain-English brief on what to do.
Start your free trialRelated changes in Pesticide & Pest-Control Applicators
- Illinois Extends Dicamba Application Date, Minnesota Stands Pat - Successful Farming
- Cypermethrin; Pesticide Tolerance(s)
- Supreme Court rules to uphold federal pesticide labels and FIFRA authority - Brownfield Ag News
- EPA Releases Temporary Guidance Regarding Certification of Pesticide Applicators During COVID-19 - pctonline.com
- Roundup®, FIFRA, and Federal Uniformity: The Supreme Court Speaks - lawbc.com