McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
The Supreme Court's decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. clarifies that TCPA consent requirements apply to calls made using any technology, including ringless voicemail, and that revocation of consent can be done through any reasonable means. This expands liability for businesses using autodialers or prerecorded messages.
Aforeworn detected this change in the Telemarketing & TCPA Compliance space on July 7, 2026 and published this briefing so affected operators are forewarned rather than caught off guard. It is rated High urgency. Contact centers, lead-gen/affiliates, SMS marketers, debt/insurance dialers should confirm how it applies to their specific situation before acting. There is a time constraint attached: Immediately; the decision is effective June 20, 2025.. Acting after that point can mean penalties, a lapsed licence, or lost eligibility — exactly the kind of surprise Aforeworn exists to prevent. Aforeworn monitors Telemarketing & TCPA Compliance continuously and turns every detected change into a plain-English briefing like this one, so you always know first. Forewarned is forearmed.
What changed
The ruling affirms that ringless voicemail is a 'call' under the TCPA, requiring prior express consent. It also confirms that consumers can revoke consent through any reasonable method, not just written revocation.
Who it affects
Contact centers, lead-gen/affiliates, SMS marketers, debt/insurance dialers
What you must do
Review and update consent and revocation processes to ensure compliance with the broadened interpretation. Implement systems to honor revocation requests made via any reasonable means (e.g., oral, email, website).
Deadline
Immediately; the decision is effective June 20, 2025.
Never miss a change like this again
Aforeworn watches Telemarketing & TCPA Compliance around the clock and alerts you the moment a rule moves — with a plain-English brief on what to do.
Start your free trial