Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA) — regulation & compliance changes
Cosmetic and personal-care manufacturers and brands complying with FDA MoCRA — facility registration, product listing, safety substantiation, adverse-event reporting, and coming fragrance-allergen and PFAS rules — the first modern federal overhaul of cosmetics oversight.
Aforeworn watches Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA) around the clock so you never have to refresh a government page again. Every detected change becomes a plain-English briefing covering what changed, who it affects, what you must do, and by when. Forewarned is forearmed.
Stay ahead of every Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA) change
Real-time alerts, plain-English impact briefs, and a full searchable history — 39+ changes tracked in Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA) so far.
Alert me on this rule✓ No card charged during your trial · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Every alert links to the official source
Recent changes in Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA)
- U.S. Releases PFAS Regulation and Accountability Act of 2026, Phasing Out Non-Essential Uses Within 10 Years - CIRS Group
- FDA withdraws proposed rule to test cosmetics made with talc for asbestos - cosmeticsbusiness.com
- VT H.14: An act relating to prohibiting the use of animals in product testing
- FDA Updates Final Guidance on Cosmetic Facility Registration and Product Listing - wiley.law
- Time’s Up! Cosmetic Facilities Must Comply With FDA’s New Registration Requirements by July 1 - wiley.law
- US-CONGRESS BILLS-119hr10048ih: Truth in Labeling Act of 2026
- FDA Withdraws Proposed Talc Cosmetics Testing Rule - Law360
- FDA Issues Final Guidance on Facility Registration and Product Listing Under MoCRA - crowell.com
- Implementing MoCRA: FDA Releases New Draft Guidances on Insanitary Conditions for Tattoo Ink and Cosmetic Product Registration & Listing - fdli.org
- FDA poised to kill proposal that would require asbestos testing for cosmetics - theguardian.com
- The FDA Withdraws Rule Requiring Asbestos Testing in Talc-Based Makeup - vogue.com
- FDA Launches Cosmetics Direct and Issues Final Guidance on Facility Registration & Product Listings Required under MoCRA - crowell.com
- FDA Withdraws Cosmetics Proposed Rule: Let Us (Not) Talk About Talc - afslaw.com
- F.D.A. Withdraws Rule to Require Testing Cosmetics Made With Talc for Asbestos - nytimes.com
- Illinois Restricts Cosmetic Ingredients Beginning July 1, 2028 - The National Law Review
- FDA Issues Compliance Policy for Cosmetic Registration Listing - fda.gov
- US-CONGRESS HR1657: Humane Cosmetics Act of 2025
- Continuing the Suspension of Duty-Free De Minimis Treatment for All Countries
- California Prop 65: DEA Judgment Reinforces First Amendment Limits on Warning Requirements - The National Law Review
- Proposition 65: California Attorney General Stipulates to Judgment Prohibiting Warning Requirements for DEA - The National Law Review
- Proposal to Revoke the Color Additive Listing for Use of Citrus Red No. 2 on the Skins of Mature Oranges
- US-CONGRESS BILLS-119hr2821eh: FDA Modernization Act 3.0
- New York’s Beauty Justice Act: Sweeping Changes Proposed for Cosmetics and Personal Care Products - JD Supra
- California regulates TPhP in nail products over toxicity links - Personal Care Insights
- FDA Publishes Two Key Guidance Documents on Cosmetics Facility Registration and Product Listing - McGuireWoods
- FDA Withdraws Proposed Asbestos-Testing Rule for Talc Cosmetics, Plans New Version Under 2022 Mandate - Global Cosmetics News
- New Bill: Representative Debbie Dingell introduces H.R. 9594: No PFAS in Cosmetics Act - Quiver Quantitative
- NJDEP Formally Adopts Site Remediation Standards for PFAS Compounds - New Jersey Business & Industry Association
- Connecticut Releases PFAS Reporting Form Ahead of July 2026 Notification Requirements - ChemLinked
- Connecticut Will Accept Label Similar to New Mexico’s PFAS Label - Bergeson & Campbell
- New Jersey bans some products with toxic PFAS chemicals. Here’s what to know - WHYY
- Illinois Governor Signs Bill Banning Intentionally Added PFAS in Certain Consumer Products and Requiring IEPA to Prepare Report on Fluoropolymers by August 1, 2027 - Bergeson & Campbell
- Landmark Cosmetic Law Adopted that Significantly Changes how Cosmetics Are Regulated by FDA - Steptoe
- FDA withdraws proposal to require talc-containing cosmetics to test for asbestos - The Hill
- The FDA Withdraws Rule Requiring Asbestos Testing in Talc-Based Makeup - Vogue
- F.D.A. Withdraws Rule to Require Testing Cosmetics Made With Talc for Asbestos - The New York Times
- FDA Withdraws Cosmetics Proposed Rule: Let Us (Not) Talk About Talc - ArentFox Schiff
- FDA Expands Sunscreen Options for the First Time in 20 Years
- Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Labeling: Cochineal Extract and Carmine Declaration
Frequently asked questions
What does Aforeworn monitor for Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA)?
Aforeworn continuously tracks the official rules, ordinances, fee schedules and licensing requirements that affect Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA), detects every change, and explains in plain English what changed, who it hits and what to do.
How fast will I hear about a change in Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA)?
Changes are detected automatically as sources update, and subscribers are alerted in real time — often before the change is widely reported.
Why does staying current on Cosmetics & Personal-Care (MoCRA) matter?
A single missed change can mean fines, a lapsed licence, or lost eligibility. Forewarned is forearmed — knowing first lets you act before it costs you.